From 4d1991e3841524175ad48805ce763d201f8738c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Studer Gabriel <gabriel.studer@unibas.ch>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:19:58 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Edit README.md

---
 examples/scoring/README.md | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/examples/scoring/README.md b/examples/scoring/README.md
index 533ce96d3..2345c4bbc 100644
--- a/examples/scoring/README.md
+++ b/examples/scoring/README.md
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ default output (out.json):
 ost compare-structures -m model.pdb -r reference.cif.gz --lddt --local-lddt --qs-score
 ```
 
-Example output: [compare-structures_example_out.json]
+An example output can be found [here](compare-structures_example_out.json)
 
 By default, model-reference chains are aligned using Needleman-Wunsch.
 Many benchmarking efforts such as CASP and CAMEO assume residue numbers
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ We can compute LDDT-PLI and BiSyRMSD with:
 ost compare-ligand-structures -m model.pdb -r reference.cif.gz -ml *.sdf --rmsd --lddt-pli
 ```
 
-Example output: [compare-ligand-structures_example_out.json]
+An example output can be found [here](compare-ligand-structures_example_out.json)
 
 Again, it is advised to use the `-rna` flag if applicable. In this example,
 reference ligands are directly extracted from the provided mmCIF file based on
-- 
GitLab