Something went wrong on our end
-
Studer Gabriel authored
Parasail: https://github.com/jeffdaily/parasail It's faster than the pairwise sequence algorithms we have in OpenStructure. However, the main reason to check out another solution is the fact that OpenStructure may return suboptimal alignment results. This is a result of how the dynamic programming table is built. If for a certain cell in the dynamic programming table a match state and insertion state score equally, match is preferred. There is a chance that we would get a better score later on if we would stick with the insertion state (gap open penalties vs. gap extension penalties). Not sure if this will be fixed in the near future.
Studer Gabriel authoredParasail: https://github.com/jeffdaily/parasail It's faster than the pairwise sequence algorithms we have in OpenStructure. However, the main reason to check out another solution is the fact that OpenStructure may return suboptimal alignment results. This is a result of how the dynamic programming table is built. If for a certain cell in the dynamic programming table a match state and insertion state score equally, match is preferred. There is a chance that we would get a better score later on if we would stick with the insertion state (gap open penalties vs. gap extension penalties). Not sure if this will be fixed in the near future.
FindParasail.cmake 392 B