- Nov 22, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
- Nov 21, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
- Nov 20, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
- Oct 23, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
- Oct 03, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
- Sep 24, 2018
-
- Aug 13, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
- Aug 10, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
- Aug 09, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
- Jul 18, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
- Jul 10, 2018
-
-
Studer Gabriel authored
This function assumes the user knows what he's doing, this is also clearly stated in the documentation: "RMSD of atom positions (taken blindly in the order in which the atoms appear) in the two given views." This check at least avoids a segfault when the number of atoms does not match. The result would be completely wrong anyway...
-
- Jul 06, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
- Jul 02, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
- Jun 11, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
- Jun 04, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
Combination of reference_existing_object and RemoveChain can lead to segfaults. Overhead of change is 1us per call for a test case with 18 chains. Hence it is absolutely negligible.
-
- May 25, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
Studer Gabriel authored
- May 23, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
- Apr 27, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
Rafal Gumienny authored
-
Rafal Gumienny authored
- Apr 26, 2018
-
-
Gerardo Tauriello authored
-
Rafal Gumienny authored
-
Rafal Gumienny authored
-
Rafal Gumienny authored
-
Rafal Gumienny authored
-
Rafal Gumienny authored
-
Rafal Gumienny authored
-